With responsible investing on the rise, comprehending the Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating methodology is crucial for investors. This guide explores the assessment process and its significance in making informed, sustainable investment choices.

What are Sustainalytics ESG Risk Ratings?

Sustainalytics ESG Risk Ratings offer a robust assessment of a company's exposure to and management of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks. These ratings enable investors to identify potential risks and opportunities within their portfolios, facilitating responsible investment decision-making and opportunities within their portfolios.

The Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating is a widely used evaluation tool designed to measure a company’s exposure to industry-specific ESG risks and how well it manages those risks. Its purpose is to provide investors with a clear, consistent, and data-driven approach to understanding ESG performance across industries and regions.

Its significance in ESG investing lies in offering a transparent, comparable measure that supports responsible capital allocation and stakeholder engagement. Companies with lower ESG risk ratings are generally considered better positioned to handle long-term challenges.

The general ESG methodology behind Sustainalytics ratings involves assessing both exposure to ESG issues and the effectiveness of management strategies. The result is a clear picture of "unmanaged risk" that can influence investment decisions and public image results.

Featured Article: The Top 3 Visible Benefits of ESG Investing

Morningstar Sustainalytics: A Global Leader in ESG Research

Since Morningstar's acquisition in July 2020, Sustainalytics now operates as Morningstar Sustainalytics, combining Sustainalytics' deep ESG expertise with Morningstar's extensive investment research capabilities. Today, the platform covers more than 15,000–16,000 companies globally, spread over 138 industry subgroups, making it one of the most comprehensive ESG rating systems available to institutional and retail investors alike.

Elements of the Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating Methodology

The Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating methodology comprises four primary elements:

Material ESG Issues: The methodology identifies material ESG issues specific to each industry, considering their potential impact on a company's financial performance and reputation. The definitions can be found here.

Exposure: Sustainalytics evaluates a company's exposure to material ESG issues, considering factors such as business operations, supply chain, and geographic location.

Management: The methodology assesses a company's ability to manage its exposure to ESG risks, analyzing its policies, practices, and performance data.

Unmanaged Risk: Sustainalytics calculates the unmanaged risk, which represents the residual risk remaining after considering a company's management efforts, or "management gap". This is something that can be addressed. "Unmanageable risk", as the name suggests, lies beyond the addressable potential of management.

Featured Article: Comparing ESG Ratings Agencies: MSCI, Morningstar, Bloomberg, LSEG and More

Need ESG Data & Analytics Tools?

May 2024 Methodology Enhancements

In May 2024, Morningstar Sustainalytics introduced the most significant updates to its ESG Risk Ratings since their launch in 2018. These changes reflect evolving ESG risks and investor needs:

Corporate Governance Overhaul: The governance assessment methodology was completely redesigned to provide more dynamic and responsive governance scores, addressing long-standing criticism that governance ratings were too static.

New Material ESG Issues (MEIs):

• Raw Materials Use: Assesses how companies source and utilize natural resources

• Water Risk: Now weighted as a standalone indicator, critical for manufacturing, agriculture, and food sectors

• Enhanced Data Privacy & Cybersecurity: Expanded to reflect post-pandemic digital transformation risks

What This Means for Investors: If you're comparing ESG ratings from before May 2024 to current ratings, be aware that scores may differ due to these methodology changes, not necessarily because of changes in company performance. The 2024 updates provide a more accurate picture of governance quality and emerging environmental risks.

How Does Sustainalytics Evaluate ESG Risk?

The Sustainalytics ESG Rating Methodology is a structured, transparent process built around evaluating ESG factors across three major pillars: Environmental, Social, and Governance risks. The assessment focuses on materiality, meaning only the ESG issues that could significantly impact financial performance are considered. Let us explore the factors related to each of the pillars.

Environmental Risk Factors

This includes evaluating a company’s impact on climate change, emissions, resource usage, and waste management. For instance, companies in energy-intensive industries are assessed for their ability to reduce carbon emissions and transition toward sustainable operations.

Social Risk Factors

Sustainalytics reviews how companies handle issues like labour practices, community relations, health and safety, diversity, and customer welfare. These insights help investors understand a company’s commitment to social responsibility and its ability to maintain stakeholder trust.

Governance Risk Factors

The governance pillar looks at board structure, executive pay, business ethics, and transparency. Companies with strong ESG governance practices are often better equipped to manage other ESG risks effectively.

Featured Article: Understanding the MSCI ESG Rating Methodology: A Comprehensive Guide

Why is the ESG Risk Rating Important for Investors?

The ESG Risk Rating empowers investors with critical insights for ESG risk assessment and portfolio optimization. By highlighting exposure to unmanaged ESG risks, the ratings support responsible investing and long-term value creation.

Real-world applications of ESG ratings include:

• Institutional investors using ESG data to screen for sustainable companies.
• Pension funds integrating ESG ratings into their fiduciary duties.
• Asset managers aligning portfolios with ESG mandates to meet client expectations.

The ESG score methodology thus provides a data-backed foundation for sustainable investing across various asset classes.

Core features of Sustainalytics' ESG Rating Methodology

Some unique features that make the Sustainalytics ESG score methodology stand out include:

• Use of comprehensive ESG metrics: These metrics are tailored to the specific risks facing each industry and business model.
• Transparent scoring system: Investors receive clear numerical ratings on a scale of 0–100, segmented into risk categories.
• Global data sources: Sustainalytics draws from regulatory filings, media coverage, NGO reports, and direct disclosures.
• Continuous updates: Ratings are reviewed regularly to reflect the most recent developments affecting ESG risk.

Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating Scale

To use the ratings effectively, investors must understand ESG score interpretation. Sustainalytics assigns ESG Risk Ratings on a numerical scale from 0 (lowest risk) to 100 (highest risk). These scores are further categorized into five risk levels:

• Negligible risk (0-9.9)
• Low risk (10-19.9)
• Medium risk (20-29.9)
• High risk (30-39.9)
• Severe risk (40+)

Companies with lower scores indicate better ESG management. The Sustainalytics rating methodology highlights not only exposure but also the quality of management. Investors should compare scores within the same industry and monitor changes over time to identify trends.

Featured Article: LSEG ESG Scores Explained: A Complete Guide to Sustainable Investing in 2026

Benefits of Using ESG Risk Ratings for Responsible Investing

Incorporating ESG Risk Ratings offers numerous benefits for ESG investing, including:

• Improved risk management: ESG ratings flag hidden risks not captured by traditional financial metrics.
• Better long-term returns: Sustainable companies often outperform peers in the long run.
• Enhanced reputation: Portfolios aligned with ESG standards boost credibility among stakeholders.
• Regulatory readiness: ESG-compliant firms are better positioned for emerging regulations.
• Informed engagement: Investors can engage more meaningfully with companies based on identified ESG weaknesses.

These benefits of ESG ratings support holistic and forward-thinking investment strategies.

Challenges and Limitations of ESG Risk Ratings

Despite their advantages, ESG ratings are not without issues. Key ESG rating challenges include:

• Data Gaps: Limited disclosure or outdated data can affect accuracy.
• Subjectivity: ESG definitions and thresholds vary across agencies.
• Lack of standardization: Divergent ESG methodologies can lead to conflicting scores for the same company.

To address these limitations of ESG methodology, investors should:

• Use ESG ratings as one tool among many.
• Combine multiple rating agencies for a balanced view.
• Engage directly with companies for clarification and deeper insights.

Featured Article: Understanding the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP): Scores, Climate & Sustainability

Final Thoughts

In summary, the Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating methodology serves as an invaluable tool for investors seeking to integrate ESG factors into their investment strategy. It offers clarity on ESG risks and supports the goals of responsible investing through data-driven insights and industry-specific analysis.

To learn more about how ESG risk ratings can strengthen your portfolio and get the right ESG service providers to understand your requirements and provide you with the help you need, explore KnowESG's Solutions for expert guidance.

Check out and compare ESG ratings performance across companies and sectors here.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating?

The Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating measures a company’s exposure to industry-specific key ESG issues and how well it manages those risks. The score helps investors understand how environmental, social, and governance factors may affect a company's performance and long-term value.

How does the Sustainalytics ESG rating methodology work?

The Sustainalytics ESG rating methodology assesses two main dimensions: a company’s exposure to material ESG risks and its management of those risks. The methodology evaluates over 20 ESG metrics, including carbon emissions, labor practices, product safety, and corporate governance structures.

Why is corporate governance important in ESG ratings?

Corporate governance plays a critical role in ESG evaluations. Sustainalytics analyzes how well a company is governed by looking at board composition, executive compensation, shareholder rights, and ethics programs, as these factors directly impact the credibility and stability of a company's performance.

What are the key ESG issues considered in the rating?

Key ESG issues include climate change, data privacy, product quality, employee well-being, supply chain management, and ethical leadership. Sustainalytics prioritizes these issues based on the company’s industry and the potential material impact on its operations and reputation.

How is carbon emissions data used in ESG risk ratings?

Carbon emissions are a vital indicator of environmental performance. Sustainalytics factors in Scope 1, 2, and sometimes Scope 3 emissions to evaluate a company’s climate impact and transition risks. High emissions with poor mitigation strategies can negatively affect a company’s risk rating.

What role does Corporate Social Responsibility play in ESG ratings?

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reflects a company’s commitment to ethical and sustainable practices. Sustainalytics incorporates CSR efforts, such as community engagement, employee welfare, and environmental stewardship, into its ESG risk analysis to determine how responsibly a company operates.

How can ESG metrics help investors make informed decisions?

ESG metrics provide a standardized way to analyze non-financial risks. Metrics like water usage, gender diversity, accident rates, and governance policies give investors insight into how well a company addresses sustainability challenges and aligns with responsible investing goals.

How does a company's performance on ESG affect its investment appeal?

A company's performance on ESG criteria can significantly influence its risk profile and attractiveness to investors. Companies with low ESG risk ratings, indicating strong management of key ESG issues like carbon emissions and corporate governance, are often seen as more resilient and forward-looking.

Last updated on February 10, 2026, by Mamata Saha.