Highlights

• A Belgian farmer challenges TotalEnergies over alleged climate-related losses linked to oil and gas production.
• The Greenpeace-backed lawsuit adds to a rising wave of global climate litigation against major energy companies.
• International court rulings on climate duties may shape the outcome of cases similar to the Belgian farmer’s claim.

A Belgian farmer has taken French energy giant TotalEnergies to court over the damage he links to climate change.

The farmer, Hugues Falys, spoke to a small crowd of supporters before the hearing and said his case aims to push TotalEnergies toward practices that are less harmful for society and agriculture.

With backing from Greenpeace, he is seeking compensation and a reduction in the company’s oil and gas production, which he argues fuels the greenhouse gas emissions driving global warming.

TotalEnergies did not respond to questions on this case, yet the company has stated in earlier legal disputes that it has reduced emissions and invested in greener energy sources.

Read More: 3,099 Climate Cases Filed Globally by Mid-2025: Report

His lawsuit joins almost a hundred cases filed worldwide against major producers such as BP, Exxon Mobil, and Shell. The report indicated that the number of climate-related cases doubled within five years. Even so, no court has ordered any company to pay damages directly tied to climate impacts.

Greenpeace Belgium urged an end to what it considers the impunity of big polluters, naming TotalEnergies specifically. Proceedings in this case are expected to continue until mid-December.

Most of these climate lawsuits take place in the United States, supported by information from the Climate Litigation Database at Columbia University. The U.S. Supreme Court recently refused to block a case from Honolulu against major firms such as Sunoco, Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and BP, and another case is underway in Colorado.

Meanwhile, climate activists have seen more success with actions targeting governments.

Also Read: Climate Lawsuits Rising in Nearly 60 Countries, Says Report

Courts in the Netherlands, France, and Montana ruled that citizens have a right to protection from the effects of rising temperatures. For example, Montana’s Supreme Court confirmed a ruling that the state violated residents’ constitutional rights by permitting fossil fuel projects without considering climate impacts.

Internationally, tribunals have stepped in as well. The UN’s top court issued an advisory opinion that nations may breach international law if they fail to take steps that shield people from the effects of climate change.

Europe’s highest human rights court also concluded that countries must protect citizens from climate hazards, siding with a group of older Swiss women in a case that may influence other proceedings. Experts say these decisions could shape future lawsuits, including domestic cases similar to the one brought by the Belgian farmer.

***

Looking for ESG specialists to up sustainability in your business?

Explore our ESG Marketplace or solutions page, which features over 1000 providers who offer affordable solutions and services tailored to your business.

Stay updated with our Climate & Environment News for the latest insights.